審査 and 審議: Evaluating works and deliberating proposals
Compare reviewing submitted works or documents with deliberating a proposed rule. Identify evaluation targets and matters for discussion without inferring an unstated outcome.
Evaluating works or documents
審査 means screening or review. 「応募作品は三人の専門家が審査した。」 reports three experts reviewing submitted works. Both the reviewers and the evaluation target are stated.
「書類審査の結果は来週通知される。」 says document-screening results will be announced next week. The notification is future, and the result itself is not specified.
Deliberating a proposed matter
審議 means deliberation. 「委員会は新しい規則案の審議を始めた。」 says a committee began deliberating a proposed new rule. The proposed rule is the matter under discussion.
「十分に審議された案だけが投票に進む。」 says only fully deliberated matters proceed to a vote. This sentence’s condition does not establish a compulsory sequence for every institution.
Evaluation targets and discussion matters
The experts’ 審査 focuses on evaluating submitted works. The committee’s 審議 focuses on examining and discussing a proposed rule. Identify what each action addresses.
The words are not divided exclusively into individual evaluation and group discussion. Three experts reviewing, a committee beginning discussion, and a future notification remain separate details.
What is evaluated in the experts’ 審査, and what is discussed in the committee’s 審議?
Show the answer and why
審査 addresses the submitted works, while 審議 addresses the proposed rule. Distinguish evaluation from deliberation without adding a passing result or an adopted rule.